|
281-242-7070

Anthony R. Segura
Broussard, McLaughlin & Segura
14015 Southwest Freeway, Suite 5
Sugar Land, Texas 77478
281-242-7070
281-242-7073
www.dwi-houston-lawyer.com
www.sugarland-dwi-lawyer.com
www.fortbend-dwi-lawyer.com
| You have only 15 days from the date
of arrest to request a hearing to save your driver's license. If
you fail to request the hearing your license, permit or privilege to
operate a motor vehicle will automatically be suspended or denied
effective 40 days from the date of your arrest. (Learn More) |
| Call 281-242-7070 to schedule a
free phone or in-person consultation with Sugar Land DWI lawyer Anthony
R. Segura |
| Get quick answers to frequently
asked questions concerning your Sugar Land DWI arrest. (Go
to FAQ's) |
|
(a) 210
liters of breath;
(b) 100
milliliters of blood; or
(c)
67 milliliters of urine.
-
Blood
testing is generally considered to be the most reliable and accurate,
while urine tests are regarded as the least precise. If you are
arrested for DWI in Texas you will most likely be asked to give a sample
of your breath. Breath testing is the most commonly utilized method
because it is the least expensive. The scientific
community is sharply divided over the accuracy and reliability of breath
testing procedures. Police do not save the sample of breath
tested. Thus it is not available for re-testing by an independent
laboratory.
TIME OF DRIVING v. TIME OF TEST
-
An
essential element of the crime of DWI is that the person is intoxicated
at the time of driving. However, chemical tests only reflect a person's
alcohol concentration at the time of testing. A person's alcohol
concentration at the time of driving may have been higher, lower or the
same. In order to link the test result to alcohol concentration at the
time of driving the prosecution may attempt to present expert testimony
concerning alcohol concentration at the time of driving. The process
the expert uses to relate the test result back to the time of driving is
known as retrograde extrapolation. However, in order for the expert to
offer an opinion which will be admissible at trial, the court must find
that the expert's opinion will be reliable. Factors effecting
reliability include:
(a) the length of time between the offense and the
test administered;
(b) the number of tests given and the length of time
between each test; and
(c) whether, and if so, to what extent, any individual
characteristics of the defendant were known to the expert. These
characteristics and behaviors might include, but are not limited t
1) weight
and gender
2)
typical drinking pattern
3) tolerance
for alcohol
4) how
much the person had to drink on the day in question,
5) what
the person drank,
6) the
duration of the drinking spree
7) the time of the last drink, and
8) how
much, what and when the person ate
INTOXILYZER 5000 - Breath Testing Device
-
Texas uses the Intoxilyzer 5000 to determine a person's
breath-alcohol concentration. The Intoxilyzer's manufacturer claims the
device works on the principle of infrared spectrometry. A sample of the
subject's breath is collected in the device's sample chamber. At one
end of the chamber is a light bulb. At the other end is a light
detector. The machine measures the amount of light that passes through
the chamber when no alcohol is present. This is this compared with the
amount of light passing through the chamber after a sample of the
subject's breath is introduced. In theory, the alcohol in a breath
sample will absorb some of the light, thus the less light that passes
through a breath sample the higher the concentration of alcohol. The
Intoxilyzer has a computer chip which processes the results of the test
to arrive at a specific alcohol concentration. The calculations the
device performs are unknown as the manufacturer refuses to release the
computer code.
-
You may
be interested to learn that the Intoxilyzer's manufacturer does not
warrant that it is fit to accurately determine the alcohol concentration
in human breath. In addition, there is no way to check the accuracy of
results obtained by using this device because the State refuses to
preserve breath specimens for future testing.
OFFICER DECIDES BETWEEN BREATH, BLOOD OR URINE TEST
-
Texas law
allows the officer to determine which type of sample to
request. For example, if the officer requests breath and you
will consent only to a blood test, your license is subject to suspension
as a refusal. However, if you submit to a chemical test you have the
right to have a physician, qualified technician, chemist, or registered
professional nurse take an additional sample of your blood for
analysis. Your request must be made within two hours of your arrest and
the police are not required to transport you for testing.
|